Scot McKnight Lectures @ Truett Seminary (Baylor)

Dr. Scot McKnight gave four lectures in October at Truett Theological Seminary at Baylor University. Listen in here.

I haven’t listened yet, but they look pretty interesting. The titles are:

Lecture # 1. American Evangelicalism & the Pastor

Lecture # 2. Universalism & the Pastor

Lecture # 3. The Gospel & the Pastor

Lecture # 4. The Atonement & the Pastor

John Goldingay on Ethics in the Decalogue

It is either no coincidence or a nice coincidence that the Decalogue moves from questions about God in its first four statements, to questions about the community and about behavior in its next five, to a question about the inner dynamic of the individual in its tenth; succeeding pages in the Torah expand on this. Right attitudes to Ywhw link with right relationships in the community and right attitudes in oneself. Right attitudes in oneself link with right attitudes to Ywhw and to other people. None of these stands on its own. They form a whole.

- John Goldingay, Israel’s Life (Old Testament Theology vol. 3)

Book Review: Apologetics to the Glory of God (John Frame)

John Frame. Apologetics to the Glory of God. Phillipsburg, NJ. Presbyterian & Reformed, 1994

Apologetics to the Glory of God is a short introduction to the apologetic approach of John Frame. Frame holds the J.D. Trimble chair of Systematic Theology and Philosophy at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, Florida and is probably best-known for his writings on presuppositional apologetics in the vein of Cornelius Van Til, of whom Frame was a student.

Apologetics (in the formal sense) is not a subject I have read widely in, so my judgments are those of a rank amateur. Even so, I found the book to be easy to understand and certainly very profitable for someone like me with almost no prior reading in the area. Frame gets right to the point, which in my view is the book’s greatest strength. The subject matter here is complex at times, but he has a real gift for breaking the arguments down into “bite-size” pieces without dumbing the subject down. His larger work on the subject, The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God, is referred to often for those who want to go deeper into his thought at various points.

After a short overview of basic definitions and concepts, the book starts at the broadest possible horizon, with metaphysics and epistemology. Frame comes from a very strong Reformed background, and the entire book from this point forward reflects this perspective. I certainly don’t see this as a weakness, but it did at times leave me scratching my head. For instance, on pp. 45 he chides (gently) Christian traditions outside of Calvinism for not having a logical working out of how “free will” and God’s sovereignty interact, and then on page 46 he is perfectly willing to allow the Trinity to go unexplained and simply be proclaimed. How the doctrine of the Trinity can be simply asserted but the relationship between human responsibility and God’s sovereignty must be given some sort of logical “theory of everything” is never spelled out. Surely not on the basis of the Nicene Creed, of all things! (I say that VERY tongue in cheek). In my case  would much rather wrestle with (or accept) the fact that how God rules His universe is beyond my understanding, than dogmatically state how this relationship works, which is what Frame seems intent to do. The fact that he wants to do as strongly as he does is surprising, but this may be par for the course in writings from a Calvinist perspective. To be fair, I would imagine this is addressed in much further detail in the larger work.

From here, Frame goes on to devote a chapter to the differences between the apologetic methods, and gives a very good explanation of what it means for an argument to be “presuppositional”. This isn’t exactly riveting reading due to the technical nature of the subject, but it was here where I learned the most, and while it might seem to some to be a rather irrelevant topic, Frame does a very good job of showing why this is not the case. Very good stuff. His discussion of the circularity of arguments is very enlightening. The book then moves  to general proofs for the existence of God, and then to more specifically Christian arguments, before looking in some depth at the “problem of evil”.  I confess to not expecting much to the “problem of evil” discussion, but I actually found it be very informative. Frame then goes on to outline different approaches of taking an “offensive” apologetic approach to different worldviews. This chapter is only 10 pages long, which to my mind was much too short, as he really had some good things to say here, and I would have been interested to read more. Perhaps he addresses this subject at length somewhere else. If so, I would be very interested to read it.

The book (minus two appendices) then ends on a practical note with a mock conversation between an agnostic and a believer on an airplane, showing in practice what the book has outlined in theory. Again, good stuff, and I applaud Frame for not forgetting the kind of “so what?” question.

The appendixes, on the other hand, seem to me to be almost totally irrelevant, but I hold out the small chance that there is someone out there who cares enough whether the “Ligonier” apologetic (whatever that means) meets the standard of being able to stand in the tradition of Cornelius Van Til to read the 24 pages that this debate gets here. I certainly don’t.

So, to summarize: Frame’s Apologetics to the Glory of God  is a good book. It’s short, gets to the point quickly and concisely, and (other than the appendices) it doesn’t linger over things that only the specialist would care about. If you are interested in apologetics at all, you will enjoy the book. If you have an interest in the presuppositional approach to apologetics or have wondered what people mean we they say something is “Van Tillian”, then you will love the book. And, if you have no interest at all in the subject, I would encourage you to check the book out anyway. You may find yourself pleasantly surprised.

Marva Dawn on Psalm 81 & Worship

“Psalm 81…leads us to contemplate first the idolatry of feelings, which is terribly destructive in subverting Christian worship. The pervasive notion that our self is what is most important and that what we get out of worship is what determines whether the worship service is a good one or not is a total reversal of what genuine worship truly is…

When we gather together with others for worship, the truths of God we celebrate can subvert the idolatry of our selves so that we can discover who our true self really is. Our true self is much larger than the way we happen to feel at the moment. If worship can easily be subverted by the contemporary culture of narcissism, then one gift of genuine worship is that it invites us to know God, to praise God, to sing for Joy, because no matter what’s going on in our lives, God is there.”

- Marva Dawn, Living in the Lamblight

Chris Thile & Jerry Douglas on the Wilderness Narrative

Be warned: The conversation really heats up at about the 2:30 mark.

Book Review: The Jesus Paradigm

David Alan Black. The Jesus Paradigm. Gonzalez, FL. Energion Publications, 2009

Thanks to Henry at Energion Publications for the review copy.

David Alan Black’s The Jesus Paradigm is one of those books that has you wanting to shout “Amen” at one moment, and then leaves you scratching your head the next. It certainly isn’t a boring book. The basic thesis of the book is that the American Protestant church needs to reclaim the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers, and come to a true and full understanding of this as requiring the ministry of every member of the body of Christ. Then we need to simply put it into action. This is the first of the “Shouting Amen!” sections, and it’s a big “Amen”. Black, like myself, is a Southern Baptist, and much of what he observes I can relate to in my own church experience. It would honestly cheapen his message to go point by point and try and summarize it, so I won’t do that. I will simply say that it is good, powerful reading, and quite convicting on many levels. Black is seriously to be commended for what he has written here, and he pulls no punches.

After this main section on discipleship, Black devotes two chapters to the Anabaptist tradition, and to practical Ecclesiology based on the principles he has outlined. We will return to these two chapters, as this was where I was left feeling a little confused on some things. Next, he gets into politics, and it is here that I imagine that most of the controversy (at least in Southern Baptist circles) will be. It’s a hard-hitting section, and Black names names. Lots of names. Its easy for me to say the following because I agree almost 100% with what Black says in these chapters, but it is so refreshing to read a book that might fall under “Theology” speak with the clarity that Black displays here. After reading the chapter, you know exactly where Black stands, what he sees as the problem in our churches related to the issues raised, and what he suggests we can do about it including practical advice for churchgoers, both in the pulpit and the pew. I mean, really, when was the last time you read a book where you could say that?

Thus far, the “Amens”, but lets return to the middle section, where we get a look at the implications for Ecclesiology as Black sees them. On page 38, we get a list of principles for the modern church pulled from the Anabaptist tradition. I just want to push back on some of these, with what seem to me to be simply gut level reactions:

Black calls for:

“breaking down walls, rather than isolationism” – At the risk of sounding sarcastic…how can one say this based on, of all things, the Anabaptist tradition? Its almost laughable to say this about Protestantism in general. Its certainly a strange thing to say coming out of a Baptist context in the American South, where there must be 200 different denominations just within the “Baptist” context. In fact, Black himself has just spent the few pages before this showing how Anabaptism was a movement based on the idea that the reformers had not gone far enough, which essentially makes it a protest movement of a protest movement. How, in that context, does one go about breaking down walls?

Black calls for:

“biblical authority instead of ecclesiastical tradition” – Well, that will go a long way toward breaking down walls, won’t it? Respectfully, I have to ask, and I have been asking myself this question for years now, what’s so wrong with tradition? Our forefathers and mothers in the Faith just might have something to say to us that’s of use, and to ignore them is just one more capitulation of the church to the voices of our modern American context, which has no memory whatsoever. By all means, the Bible should critique our traditions, whether ancient or modern. I would say the problem is that the Bible is NOT being allowed to critique some of our modern church practices. Surely ruling “ecclesiastical tradition” out of isn’t the answer. This leads onto…

Black calls for:

“The catholicity of the true church, rather than sectarianism” – Really? I think I’ll just let this hang there.

I won’t go on, but I can say I was left confused by much of this section, although I’m willing to think on these things and possible have my mind changed. I agree with Black on the major points, but I think I differ greatly on the means of getting there. His call for community and activeness within the church is to be commended, and the last thing I would want is to allow what I think we would disagree on to eclipse the need to hear the overall message of the book.

I’m not naive enough to think that the quality of a book is based on what percentage of the book I agree with, but in any case, I found the VAST majority of the book to be incredibly helpful, clear, and engaging. The little that I want to quibble about has only stirred me to more thinking on the issues, and it would be a great book to read in a group and discuss. The chapters on ecclesiology and politics would  be particularly interesting in this setting. I commend the book to all, and particularly those who like me are in a Southern Baptist context, to really get you thinking about these things that are incredibly important to our life as the Church, and are so often neglected by so many.

David Alan Black has taught New Testament and Greek for over 30 years. Most importantly, he is a brother in Christ. He and his wife live on a 123-acre working farm in Southern Virginia and are self-supporting missionaries to Ethiopia. He also hosts the popular blog, Dave Black Online.

Audio Lecture: Kallistos Ware on Eastern Orthodox & Evangelical Dialogue

Listen here.

Book Review: The Life of Prayer

Allan Hugh Cole Jr. The Life of Prayer. Louisville, KY. WJK Press, 2009.

 

Sincere thanks go to WJK Press for the review copy.

Books on prayer always seem a little strange. I mean the best advice on prayer is simply to do it, right? Well, maybe, but of course sometimes a little help in thinking it through is needful, and it is to that end that a book like The Life of Prayer can be a good thing.

 

The Life of Prayer is a short book (roughly 130 pages), divided into six chapters, covering the “what’s, why’s, how’s, and with’s (praying in community)”. Obviously, with such a short length, the author only has time to scratch the surface, so the conversation stays pretty basic, but the book is not shallow by any means. The discussion is always grounded in the Bible, with the Gospels and Paul’s letters getting the bulk of attention, but with attention given also to what various theologians have had to say on the subject, notably John Calvin, and of course the BIG 3 B’s of mainline protestantism (Barth, Bonheoffer, and Brueggemann). Ok, well not Brueggemann so much, but he does contribute a blurb for the back. It is easy reading, but it is good stuff, filled with personal anecdotes of real pastoral experience leading congregations, and with the stories of normal folks who sometimes struggle with prayer.

Chapters 1 lays out how the author sees prayer as fitting into the life of the Christian as an individual. Contrast is made between both the “new age” sort of folk spirituality that floats around North American culture at large and the prosperity gospel of Creflo Dollar and Joyce Meyer, with a Christian alternative. The book will later bring in some suggestions which may fit more in the Catholic or Eastern Orthodox traditions, but for the most part this is a book for protestants, and probably mainline protestants at that. For instance, there is little talk of praying in tongues, on the one side, or praying with icons, on the other.

Chapter 2 (Why Do We Pray) is easily my favorite chapter of the book, and it is here that the author’s affinity with Bonheoffer becomes apparent as he is quoted at some length. The is the most theologically deep chapter of the book, and deserves to be re-read as a foundation for the more practical chapter which follow on from it.

Chapters 3 and 4 go on basically to look at the various benefits of prayer, both for the individual and in the community. The discussion of the importance of praying with others within the community certainly hit home for me, and I could stand to take much of what he says on board. I would imagine this to be true of most North American churches.

Chapter 5 is the climax of the book and its here where the “meat” lies as far as practical advice. Here, Cole lays out different ways of praying, under four broad headings:

Praying the Lord’s Prayer

Praying Scripture

Contemplative Prayer

Liturgical Prayer

Under each heading, Cole ranges broadly, with the discussion touching on various issues such as the importance of scripture memorization, the place of the Psalms as guides for prayer, and an apologia of sorts for using liturgy in prayer, as opposed to always “winging it”. On a personal note, it is interesting to me how these all seem to me to be minimized in the current North American Evangelical landscape, and its here that the “just do it” sort of attitude to prayer begins to break down. There are other ways to pray than just speaking your mind to God, although of course the author would also see a place for that.  Like chapter 2, this one should also be re-read, to really get at the points that it is making.

The remainder of the book then lays out a routine for prayer, with each week devoting more and more time and different ways of praying, as a suggestion for cultivating a more robust prayer life, along with a short list of books that can be used to pray liturgically.

Bottom Line:

Phyllis Tickle, on the back cover of The Life of Prayer, says that this book is “the most complete tutorial on the basics of Christian prayer that I have ever seen”. That’s quite a statement about a paperback of about 130 pages, even taking into account the typical book blurb hyperbole. The book most certainly isn’t that. What it is, rather, is an easily accessible, theologically astute, and above all practical guide to the simple act of praying, that can be read with benefit by the lay person in the pew. I would imagine that is much more valuable than a complete treatment, in any case.

Alan Hugh Cole Jr. is Nancy Taylor Williamson Associate Professor of Pastoral Care at Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary.

N.T. Wright on Reading the Grand Narrative of Scripture

Good stuff.

The Whole Sweep Of Scripture from The Work Of The People on Vimeo.

Israeli President Netanyahu Urges US to Return to 1845 Borders

This is just too good to pass up:

U.S aggression has forced Mexicans into a life of hopelessness, drugs and underemployment.

Netanyahu Urges U.S. Return to 1845 Borders

Israeli PM calls for “just solution” to end the conflict.

Aboard Air Force Aleph (Reuters) – Speaking to reporters accompanying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his long flight to the United States tonight, Netanyahu spoke of the injustice and hardship Mexicans have endured since American forces annexed Texas in 1845. “Tens of thousands of ordinary Mexicans were driven out of their homes – the only homes they had known for centuries – and forced to live in poverty and squalor south of the border imposed by American aggression,” Netanyahu said. “The Israeli and Mexican people agree on this: This festering wound will never heal until America takes bold steps to return to the internationally accepted lines of 1845. Clearly the settlement activity that’s taken place in occupied Mexico since then is illegal. When I meet the President tomorrow I will tell him to halt all building activity in Texas immediately. Two lands for two peoples, yes, but not on land taken by force from Mexico,” the Prime Minister said.

Asked if his hard-line stance could hurt the U.S.-Israel relationship, Netanyahu reiterated Israel’s commitment to America’s security and the unshakeable friendship shared by the two countries, then added, “But who was it who said, part of friendship is being able to tell your friend the truth. The ball is now in Obama’s court.”

The full story is posted here.

Thanks to Fr. Stephen Smuts for posting the story (and lots of other good stuff).